⚡ Interrogation des APIs scientifiques en cours…
⚡ Interrogation des APIs scientifiques en cours…
Authors' conclusion
Does not affect the score
Publi-Score
Fidelity
Abstract (PubMed)
Prior unblinded studies have suggested that catheter-based renal-artery denervation reduces blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension.
We designed a prospective, single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Patients with severe resistant hypertension were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to undergo renal denervation or a sham procedure. Before randomization, patients were receiving a stable antihypertensive regimen involving maximally tolerated doses of at least three drugs, including a diuretic. The primary efficacy end point was the change in office systolic blood pressure at 6 months; a secondary efficacy end point was the change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure. The primary safety end point was a composite of death, end-stage renal disease, embolic events resulting in end-organ damage, renovascular complications, or hypertensive crisis at 1 month or new renal-artery stenosis of more than 70% at 6 months.
A total of 535 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) change in systolic blood pressure at 6 months was -14.13±23.93 mm Hg in the denervation group as compared with -11.74±25.94 mm Hg in the sham-procedure group (P<0.001 for both comparisons of the change from baseline), for a difference of -2.39 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.89 to 2.12; P=0.26 for superiority with a margin of 5 mm Hg). The change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure was -6.75±15.11 mm Hg in the denervation group and -4.79±17.25 mm Hg in the sham-procedure group, for a difference of -1.96 mm Hg (95% CI, -4.97 to 1.06; P=0.98 for superiority with a margin of 2 mm Hg). There were no significant differences in safety between the two groups.
This blinded trial did not show a significant reduction of systolic blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension 6 months after renal-artery denervation as compared with a sham control. (Funded by Medtronic; SYMPLICITY HTN-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01418261.).
Coeff. authors = avg(0.65, 0.85) = 0.75
Coeff. editorial = avg(1.00, 0.70) = 1.00
min(0.75, 1.00) ← lowest dominates
37.9/50.8 × 0.75 × 100
Un essai randomisé sur le contrôle tensionnel intensif versus standard
Wright JT Jr — 2015 · New England Journal of Medicine
Atézolizumab et Nab-Paclitaxel dans le cancer du sein triple négatif avancé.
Schmid P — 2018 · The New England journal of medicine
Excrétion urinaire de sodium, pression artérielle, maladies cardiovasculaires et mortal…
Mente A — 2018 · Lancet (London, England)
Amélioration de la survie avec le vémurafénib dans le mélanome avec mutation BRAF V600E.
Chapman PB — 2011 · The New England journal of medicine
Efficacité et innocuité de la colchicine à faible dose après un infarctus du myocarde.
Tardif JC — 2019 · The New England Journal of Medicine