⚡ Interrogation des APIs scientifiques en cours…
⚡ Interrogation des APIs scientifiques en cours…
Authors' conclusion
Does not affect the score
Publi-Score
Fidelity
Abstract (PubMed)
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently.
In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety.
A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups.
A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.).
Coeff. authors = avg(0.85, 0.80) = 0.83
Coeff. editorial = avg(1.00, 0.70) = 1.00
min(0.83, 1.00) ← lowest dominates
77.3/100 × 0.83 × 100
Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant.
Andrews N — 2022 · The New England journal of medicine
Protection against Covid-19 by BNT162b2 Booster across Age Groups.
Bar-On YM — 2021 · N Engl J Med
Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19…
Logunov DY — 2021 · Lancet (London, England)
Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From Decembe…
Oster ME — 2022 · JAMA
Impact of original, B.1.1.7, and B.1.351/P.1 SARS-CoV-2 lineages on vaccine effectivene…
Charmet T — 2021 · Lancet Regional Health – Europe
Association Between BNT162b2 Vaccination and Long COVID After Infections Not Requiring …
Azzolini E — 2022 · JAMA