⚡ Interrogation des APIs scientifiques en cours…
⚡ Interrogation des APIs scientifiques en cours…
Authors' conclusion
Does not affect the score
Publi-Score
Fidelity
Abstract (PubMed)
No network meta-analysis has examined the relative effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of depression, while this is a very important clinical issue. We conducted systematic searches in bibliographical databases to identify randomized trials in which a psychotherapy and a pharmacotherapy for the acute or long-term treatment of depression were compared with each other, or in which the combination of a psychotherapy and a pharmacotherapy was compared with either one alone. The main outcome was treatment response (50% improvement between baseline and endpoint). Remission and acceptability (defined as study drop-out for any reason) were also examined. Possible moderators that were assessed included chronic and treatment-resistant depression and baseline severity of depression. Effects were presented as relative risk (RR) using a random-effects model. A total of 101 studies with 11,910 patients were included. Depression in most studies was moderate to severe. In the network meta-analysis, combined treatment was more effective than psychotherapy alone (RR=1.27; 95% CI: 1.14-1.39) and pharmacotherapy alone (RR=1.25; 95% CI: 1.14-1.37) in achieving response at the end of treatment. No significant difference was found between psychotherapy alone and pharmacotherapy alone (RR=0.99; 95% CI: 0.92-1.08). Similar results were found for remission. Combined treatment (RR=1.23; 95% CI: 1.05-1.45) and psychotherapy alone (RR=1.17; 95% CI: 1.02-1.32) were more acceptable than pharmacotherapy. Results were similar for chronic and treatment-resistant depression. The combination of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy seems to be the best choice for patients with moderate depression. More research is needed on long-term effects of treatments (including cost-effectiveness), on the impact of specific pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, and on the effects in specific populations of patients.
Coeff. authors = avg(1.00, 1.00) = 1.00
Coeff. editorial = avg(0.90, 0.90) = 0.90
min(1.00, 0.90) = 0.90← lowest dominates
Final coefficient : 0.90
Final score = 53.8/100 × 0.90 × 100 = 49/100
Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the …
Kirsch I — 2008 · PLOS Medicine
Acute and Longer-Term Outcomes in Depressed Outpatients Requiring One or Several Treatm…
Rush AJ — 2006 · American Journal of Psychiatry
The serotonin theory of depression: a systematic umbrella review of the evidence
Moncrieff J — 2022 · Molecular Psychiatry
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatme…
Cipriani A — 2018 · The Lancet
Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site…
Murrough JW — 2013 · Biological Psychiatry