⚡ Interrogation des APIs scientifiques en cours…
⚡ Interrogation des APIs scientifiques en cours…
Authors' conclusion
Does not affect the score
Publi-Score
Fidelity
Abstract (PubMed)
BACKGROUND: The benefits of blood pressure lowering treatment for prevention of cardiovascular disease are well established. However, the extent to which these effects differ by baseline blood pressure, presence of comorbidities, or drug class is less clear. METHOD: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE for large-scale blood pressure lowering trials, published between Jan 1, 1966, and July 7, 2015. All randomised controlled trials of blood pressure lowering treatment were included. We tabulated meta-analyses of 10 mmHg reductions in systolic blood pressure, and meta-regression analyses of the effects of blood pressure lowering according to baseline systolic blood pressure and the presence of coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. RESULTS: We identified 123 studies with 613,815 participants. Meta-regression analyses showed relative risk reductions proportional to the magnitude of blood pressure reductions achieved. Every 10 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure significantly reduced the risk of major cardiovascular disease events (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.77-0.83), coronary heart disease (0.83, 0.78-0.88), stroke (0.73, 0.68-0.77), and heart failure (0.72, 0.67-0.78), which, in the populations studied, led to a significant 13% reduction in all-cause mortality (0.87, 0.84-0.91). INTERPRETATION: Blood pressure lowering significantly reduces vascular risk across various baseline blood pressure levels and comorbidities. Our results provide strong support for lowering blood pressure to systolic blood pressures less than 130 mmHg and providing blood pressure lowering treatment to individuals with a history of cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research and Oxford Martin School.
Coeff. authors = avg(0.65, 1.00) = 0.83
Coeff. editorial = avg(1.00, 0.90) = 0.95
min(0.83, 0.95) = 0.83← lowest dominates
Final coefficient : 0.83
Final score = 49.0/52.8 × 0.83 × 100 = 77/100
Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19.
Mehra MR — 2020 · The New England Journal of Medicine
Contrasted resultsDapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.
McMurray JJV — 2019 · The New England journal of medicine
Contrasted resultsCardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia.
Bhatt DL — 2018 · The New England journal of medicine
Contrasted resultsEvolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.
Sabatine MS — 2017 · The New England journal of medicine
Contrasted resultsEzetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes.
Cannon CP — 2015 · The New England journal of medicine