⚡ Interrogation des APIs scientifiques en cours…
⚡ Interrogation des APIs scientifiques en cours…
Authors' conclusion
Does not affect the score
Publi-Score
Fidelity
Abstract (PubMed)
Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor, was associated with encouraging overall survival in uncontrolled studies involving previously treated patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 study compared nivolumab with everolimus in patients with renal-cell carcinoma who had received previous treatment.
A total of 821 patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma for which they had received previous treatment with one or two regimens of antiangiogenic therapy were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive 3 mg of nivolumab per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 2 weeks or a 10-mg everolimus tablet orally once daily. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points included the objective response rate and safety.
The median overall survival was 25.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8 to not estimable) with nivolumab and 19.6 months (95% CI, 17.6 to 23.1) with everolimus. The hazard ratio for death with nivolumab versus everolimus was 0.73 (98.5% CI, 0.57 to 0.93; P=0.002), which met the prespecified criterion for superiority (P≤0.0148). The objective response rate was greater with nivolumab than with everolimus (25% vs. 5%; odds ratio, 5.98 [95% CI, 3.68 to 9.72]; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.4) with nivolumab and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.5) with everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.03; P=0.11). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19% of the patients receiving nivolumab and in 37% of the patients receiving everolimus; the most common event with nivolumab was fatigue (in 2% of the patients), and the most common event with everolimus was anemia (in 8%).
Among patients with previously treated advanced renal-cell carcinoma, overall survival was longer and fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred with nivolumab than with everolimus. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 025 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01668784.).
Coeff. authors = avg(0.65, 0.70) = 0.68
Coeff. editorial = avg(1.00, 0.70) = 1.00
min(0.68, 1.00) ← lowest dominates
42.9/50.8 × 0.68 × 100
Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma.
Robert C — 2015 · The New England Journal of Medicine
Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Piccart-Gebhart MJ — 2005 · The New England journal of medicine
A randomized controlled trial of the tumor necrosis factor antagonist infliximab for tr…
Raison C. — 2013 · JAMA psychiatry
Determination of carboplatin in plasma and tumor by high-performance liquid chromatogra…
Guo P. — 2003 · Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences
Atezolizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Schmid P — 2018 · The New England journal of medicine
Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation.
Chapman PB — 2011 · The New England journal of medicine