Publi-Score
AnalyzeCatalogueMethodologyBlogPro Access

Blog

Articles on scientific methodology, publication bias, and study reliability.

AnalysisMay 18, 2026· 8 min read

Monteiro, Lancet 2025: why our score is D

The most awaited UPF meta-analysis of 2025. Our score: D (43/100). Yet an A is possible in The Lancet (Rothwell 2011, 79/A). We score method, not prestige. Criterion-by-criterion analysis.

→
MethodologyMay 17, 2026· 8 min read

Score without PDF: 60% Fidelity, a complementary signal

The article is behind a paywall. Publi-Score can still score it — measured Fidelity 60%. What the AI reads without the PDF, what it cannot see, and why the tier stays close in 86% of cases.

→
MethodologyApril 18, 2026· 7 min read

The Science Nutri-Score: How We Score an Article

7 categories, an integrity coefficient, an A–E and X scale. How Publi-Score evaluates the methodological rigor of a publication.

→
VisionApril 18, 2026· 5 min read

Why We Built Publi-Score

To fight scientific misinformation, we needed a tool everyone could understand. Our founding manifesto.

→
Subscribe to RSS feed
Publi-Score

The quality score for scientific publications. 100% free, 100% independent.

Navigation

  • Home
  • Analyze an article
  • Methodology
  • Blog
  • My account

Transparency

  • Our independence
  • Methodological transparency
  • Pro Access
  • Contact us
  • Legal notice
  • Privacy
  • ToU
  • ToS
  • Glossary

Developers

  • GitHub

© 2026 Publi-Score.

Free score, forever.